|
Shifting
Ground:
Moving Beyond Geologic Time in Unitarian
Universalism
A
sermon offered at The Unitarian Universalist Church of Lafayette,
Indiana
By
Rev. Hilary Landau Krivchenia
Reading
From
the sermon: FROM THE FUTURE COMES A CRY
By
Rev.
A. Powell Davies, D.D.
Minister,
All Soul's Church (Unitarian)
December 30, 1945
This
year, however, events have so exceeded all previous lengths and
breadths of computation that the scale of reckoning itself has been
eclipsed. Nowhere within the period known as history can we
find a reference point coordinate with our present situation.
We have to go beyond historic time to what we only know through myth
and folklore: the pains and perils of the dawn of human
consciousness, the fabled threat of universal flood and other
prophesies of dissolution; or, as most of the commentators seem to
prefer, to the audacious moment when man first began to subdue to
his own uses the furious majesty of fire.
But
even when we have considered both history and the prehistoric, there
was never a time quite like this. We ourselves are not
contemplating events which might be brought about by gods or demons;
we are not thinking in terms of earthquakes, floods or natural
calamities; we are not even reflecting upon the ultimate exhaustion
of the earth we live upon, as scientists have sometimes done, or
upon its destruction through some cosmic accident; we are not
thinking at all of something which might happen to us, but of
something which we ourselves might cause to happen. Now
we wonder how we ourselves can cope with overwhelming problems, with
dangers close at hand.
Yet,
as the most eventful year in history passes, we who have lived
through that year are filled with fears. What are we afraid
of? We can answer the question in a single word: ourselves.
Not of natural forces, uncontrollable or hostile to us. Not of
gods and supernatural beings. We are not even, in the last
analysis, afraid of other men, other kinds of men. We know at
last how very much all other men are like us. We are not
afraid of their acting as we, ourselves, could never act. We
are afraid that they may do just exactly what we might do in
provoking circumstances, or when we are irresponsible, prejudiced,
greedy, stupid, stubborn, or impelled by our lower motives away from
our best and towards our worst. Will human nature prove
sufficient to the opportunities and dangers of this new age?
Yet,
I shall not be surprised if we grow more hopeful. It is not
impossible, that we shall transcend our mediocrity, our narrow
vision, our cowardly habits and indulgences, and meet each crisis as
it comes, if not triumphantly then earnestly and bravely.
Human
life itself has reached a crisis.
The present culmination was predictable. Anyone who
cannot grasp the larger truth of what the present crisis means--the
truth that man is required to raise the level of his life to the
point of actual transformation--will prove incapable of
understanding the situation of which he is a part. To
people accustomed to truth dispensed in retail sizes, it will seem
too wholesale to be credible. All older, easier ways of life are
ending. It will be a higher humanity than our own which will
inherit that future: it will be and it should be.
We are too full of prejudice, of blindness, of greed, of hate and
superstition--yet we can prepare the way. To survive, we must.
To that level we must rise.
For
"from the future comes a cry"--a cry of challenge, a cry
of entreaty. It is what we aim towards that gives our lives
their meaning. Evolution is not the blind pushing of life
forward so much as the purposive pulling of it onward. There
is no interpretation of life at all except as growth; and growth can
only be explained in terms of what it moves towards. The
refusal of a fuller human stature when the moment which requires it
has arrived is an invitation to death. We must begin to be
altogether human, building a fully human world, or return--as to
ourselves--self-defeated and unfulfilled, to the dust from which we
came. "From the future comes a cry."
Let
no one suppose that this is a time to lose or lessen faith. It
is a time to lose worthless creeds. The greater truths remain
more true than ever. Yes, and faith is not, as some have said,
a meager candle in the dark, but a thousand, thousand torches.
It
was for times like these and faith like this that humanity was made:
we with our fears and doubts, insufficiencies and contradictions;
with our loves and hates, joys and pain; we that have never been
altogether human -- but shall be. For "the spirit in the
life" is in us.
Sermon
Some years ago, I
packed my things and drove north from Georgia to Chicago.
I remember that first night, with Maeve, in the back in her
car seat sleeping. At
some point the quiet and dark crept up on me.
I wasn’t sure where the next exit was to spend the night
and I wondered where I was really headed.
What was Unitarian Universalism anyway, that I should give my
life to it, what would I discover at school about this religion –
would there really be a there – there?
What was it all really about – all this unity in diverse
belief, all this – religion?
It did not take me long to find many answers – answers
which outnumbered questions, answers which prompted further
questions. And yet, I
still want the question asked again and again – what are we about,
what are we about that we should hang a sign outside claiming to be
descendants of a great tradition?
It is in this
spirit that I welcome you this morning.
Thank you for rising on this Sunday morning and choosing this
place for your sacred hour out of ordinary time.
Some of you may be here for the first time and wondering what
this church is all about. Some
of you may have been coming for months or for years and wondering
what this church is all about.
You may be sitting with a sense, an opinion, a growing
awareness of the meaning of this place and this faith -- Today I
want us to delve deeper than our simple questions or answers and
even beyond the hard-won and carefully reasoned answers.
Today I am
calling the question. Because
we, this congregation, is in a great transition -- making ready to
break ground for a new building. Because this transition demands so
much of us and we ought to know why we are giving it -- why we
should build for the future. Because
this is world at risk and we must know if our risk is worthy, if we
are truly building toward the future or if we are attempting to set
in stone -- or more likely concrete -- some vestige or even a paean
to the past. I am
calling the question because there is something holy and vital here,
in this place, in this Unitarian Universalism.
I am calling
the question -- because it is being called all around us by history
and we carry, indeed, precious answers.
I am calling the question because we should be calling the
question every time we gather -- what is the meaning of our meeting
-- what is purpose, for what do we hope, by what are we drawn, by
what are we commanded.
However, I am
not going name any answers today -- I only hope to name the ground
upon which to ask. I
hope to come closer next week, but I know that everyone of you -- I
hope that every one of you -- in reason, in love, in wisdom, by
experience, and in hope will be asking and answering, yourselves,
working in the expanses of your hearts and minds.
Our venture will require nothing less.
It’s often easier
to say what we are not -- to describe ourselves by what you won't
find here -- the negative is secure, concrete, permanent, clear -- I
can surely say some of what I am not, what I have left behind -- but
to say what I am, what we are is like trying to hold water in your
palms. So too often we
simply affirm what we like, what seems safe, general and yet is an
insufficient reason for coming here or calling this a church -- if
we were simply here to enjoy one another's company and have coffee
-- as even we sometimes jest -- we might as well change our name
from church to club.
So, welcome
this Sunday -- to our small but powerful faith with a long and
powerful history -- and a catalogue of great names and leaders to
look back toward. Sometimes
this past and those names make me feel more secure -- when people
make foolish light of our small religion -- from Garrison Keillor to
the Simpsons -- to the man or woman on the street, at the local gym,
on the phone -- "Isn't that the church where you can believe
anything?" or "I've heard that Unitarian Universalism is a
non-prophet religion."
In truth, my
reasoned faith is not so easily shaken -- I have searched my soul
for too long and I have studied too many other religions.
I hear in these questions and quips our nearly universal
human insecurity about the whole religious venture.
Organized
religion has taken some serious blows from modernity and then again
from post-modernity—the ground shifted and shifted again. Science bumped religion up against evolution and reason and
the ancient religious stories, which had been variously sacrosanct
paled and wavered. An
the stories of the world’s religions bumped up against each other
causing each one to both brighten a little and pale a little.
At college Joseph Cambpell came to speak to us about
myth—about religion as empowering myth and even about our
individual lives as made of myths which can—with the power of
Gods—create, or destroy.
The ground
beneath us has shifted—we have charted the shifts, sometimes we
have been the agents of those shifts, often we have shifted with the
ground—resetting with joy and discovery.
At times we, too, have been shaken by those seismic shocks.
We have not
escaped the challenges of our times.
There have been Four Great Awakenings and we have responded
to each one, tempered each one, brought reason into the equation and
emerged, ourselves, with the best.
Yet, we have sometimes fallen short of the cry of history –
because we have been subject to many of the same pulls, pressures,
and erosions, which have faced other religions.
As Unitarians
and Universalists, we optimistically claimed that humanity was
inherently god-like and worthy:
the Universalist assertion was of the supreme value of every
human personality. And
the Unitarians also championed the human spirit – without denying
our shortcomings. As
the Reverend William Ellery Channing said in 1828: “I do
and I must reverence human nature.
Neither the sneers of a worldly skepticism, nor the groans of
a gloomy theology, disturb my faith in its godlike powers and
tendencies. I know its
history. I shut my eyes
on none of its weaknesses and crimes.
But, injured, trampled on, and scorned as our nature is, I
still turn to it with intense sympathy and strong hope.”
The
Enlightenment made us think-feel free and hopeful. Revolutions toppled autocracies (or so we thought), ended
slavery (or so we thought). It
was looking good when our Ben Franklin harnessed electricity and
others created great new gadgets to run on its power.
It was looking pretty good when as my colleague David
Bumbaugh says, it turned out that Jonas Salk was, perhaps, a little
brighter than God. Humans
were on the yellow brick road to enlightenment and the wizard was
just an ordinary man from the Midwest.
But it ceased
to look so good for either God or humanity as our struggles failed
to vanish, our reconstructions and revolutions were complex and
often disappointing. It
ceased to look so good for either God or humanity when the 1st World
War sent back its staggering death tolls and accounts of brutality
-- when the recognized evil on both sides of WWII was revealed in
the death camps and the dropping of the bomb.
When ideas turned into new Gods in Totalitarian systems such
as fascism and Stalinism and trampled human lives.
Clearly God was on no ones side and it just might be that the
road to good was always paved with hell.
By the end of
WWII both God and humanity had taken a beating. We were sobered and the day of reckoning had arrived.
The world was in our hands and our hands were shaking.
Although the greatest leaders of the 20th century
had been religious -- in the persons of Mohandas Gandhi and
Martin Luther King—the secure spires of the church seemed delicate
as sugar icing.
Of course, I
am painting in broad strokes that overlook our finest
accomplishments —but every human creation requires keen attention
and care, require a constant vigilance to maintain.
Freedom is more of a verb than a place at which we arrive.
Democracy, as the bumper sticker says, is not what we have
it’s what we do.
Perhaps to
dull the pain of these sobering 20th Century revelations,
over Americans came a wave of intense consumerism.
New labor saving devices and expensive gadgets pulled us in
and the lord of television kept us all home, losing sight of our
common spaces—even of our churches.
I recall counting it a blessing when, in my childhood, I
learned that church attendance was at an all time low.
For a while, Unitarian Universalist churches experienced a
blip of growth based on an identity as the un-church – just like
the 7Up the Un-cola. Still
the cult of consumerism, the death of the commons, and the supremacy
of the individual grew in strength.
And there came
to pass—on multiple levels -- the death of authority.
Churches, including our own, experienced this death on many
fronts. The loss of
authority of the stories—of the history of the tradition.
Churches, even our own, were no longer shored up by
meaningful stories—either of the glory or of the falleness of
creation. Non-prophet,
non-poetic, non-storied.
The clergy were no longer the bearers of the
prophetic voice. The
very notion of authority faltered—and became—to paraphrase my
colleague David again—“well, here’s my limited opinion, from
my shrunken vantage point, in my historically blinkered
perspective”. I
invite you to consider authority not as in authority figures – but
in terms of the authority of a life, of wisdom, of connection
through history – the authors of a life of vision in the world.
And this
worsened as the cult of consumerism gained in strength and power.
In a world of ceaseless work to maintain and purchase new and
better fruits of our ceaseless labors, leisure time has become a key
industry. The worship
experience became another choice for leisure time.
It became a time for socializing rather than for the building
of what Victor Turner called Communitas—or what MLK, Jr called the
beloved community. How
deep do we delve? Do we challenge ourselves or only superficially
soothe one another’s ruffled feathers.
Worship—worth schippen—the shaping of that which is of
worth, cannot be shallow. How deeply are we each willing to put our
hands in the common clay and our common spiritual life and shape it?
And pass it through the real fires of our mind to fashion
something which can, as Kim Harden used this metaphor months ago,
something which can hold something life giving.
Can we take ourselves seriously without becoming carved in
stone?
If worship
time is just another leisure time activity the professional
religious leaders cannot proclaim or declaim —only talk.
There is no claim, only the management of leisure time
activity. The creation
of time set apart for the cultivation of the soul is made
superficial, simple, and of course, short enough to get on to other
leisure activities.
So the
authority of the tradition is weakened—the line from which we come
as professional clergy is weakened.
And this results in the lay people—the people in the pews
or chairs—becoming a mere social group, a group of consumers and
critics. The authority of what James Luther Adams Unitarian
Universalist theologian called the Prophethood of All Believers—is
reduced to a gathering of those who opine and privately, when they
have time, do good without sharing our good news.
Of course, we
are—and wisely—reacting to the Fourth Great Awakening, that
began in the 60s. We
are responding to the easy-answer fundamentalisms that attacked the
spirit of the Enlightenment. We
-- Unitarian Universalists will never choose the graven answer, the
final solution, the story unable to stand in the light of reason.
When we refer to fundamentals we most often mean the periodic
table of elements.
But we too are
distracted from the serious business at hand. In 1945 Rev. A. Powell Davies of the UU Church of All Souls
in Washington, DC preached “From
the future comes a cry…” We are that future.
This church is stretched by the challenge to cease crying and
answer. And the
challenge is hard and it is easy to be tricked by the superficial
answers and formulas.
I proclaim –
we are not just a church façade where those who disbelieve stories
ABCDorE can hide on Sunday morning.
What faces us now is not served by formulations such as the
conflict between Theist and Humanists, between Puritan patterns of
worship versus the re-emergence of enthusiasm, between science or
faith in an ancient mythic story, between one generation and
another, between an informal religion of consensus and a religion of
democracy. These formulations do not serve us because none of these
things mean what they once meant – for example -- the theists here
are not the theists we once decried – their God or their Gods are
new and different and evolving and the humanists have, by science,
grown to embrace a fuller cosmos of being.
And our science is beyond simple reckoning…But, let me
leave some for next week…These formulations do not serve us
because they distract us from the real challenge that faces us now
– that of affirming our deep story – not story, as in fiction,
but story as in history, understanding, vision, revelation.
Let nothing distract us.
We have faced
the same challenges and deconstructions that all religions have
faced – in part because of our very role in the American Project,
in part because we, too, are knee to knee with all other religions.
We have faced those deconstructions but we have chosen this
seat. And we are
greater than all of that. We
are not the Church of the Lowest Common Denominator but of the
highest.
Hidden in
our very core is our answer – in the deep, velvet folds of our
principles, purposes and living tradition.
Not graven nor final – but dancing and alive in a balance
between science and story, process and experience, knowing, and
intuiting. If we are
too distracted by the superficial formulations waved before us we
will never get down into those folds and find our true and current
ground. And we, too
hear cries as solemn as those heard in 1945.
Yes, our
ground has shifted – it always has and ever will – that is why
we are principled and yet creedless.
Let us not be distracted, but delve deep for meaning and
worth.
My friend
David also says that the sermon is not over when the words are done
– but that every hearer writes it and works it further through his
or her life. We are the
teachers for whom Emerson called.
Therefore, I await your reflection, your response, your work,
your expanding revelation. Empower
your church by attending our congregational meeting today and the
growth workshop in a few weeks.
Take these thoughts and live with them and return next week
to carry them further. Call
the question within yourself – ask yourself about the heart of our
Unitarian Universalism.
There is
something holy and vital here in this place and in Unitarian
Universalism. History
prays that we shape something redeeming of our broken world, the
present and future cry out for us to build, not only edifices, but
to build the ongoing revelation of our faith and the foundation of a
just world. It is worth
our every risk. We need
only begin here, where a powerful story lives and breathes – in
our principles and purposes and our living tradition -- you.
The answers to the prayers of history and the cries of the
future live in your minds and hearts and hands and are working
through your lives – like the journeywork of the stars, of hope,
and the promise of deep Spring.
|